Some of the material in is restricted to members of the community. By logging in, you may be able to gain additional access to certain collections or items. If you have questions about access or logging in, please use the form on the Contact Page.
Parametric uncertainty analysis of surface complexation modeling (SCM) has been studied using linear and nonlinear analysis. A computational SCM model was developed by Kohler et al. (1996) to simulate the breakthrough of Uranium(VI) in a column of quartz. Calibration of parameters which describe the reactions involved during reactive-transport simulation has been found to fit experimental data well. Further uncertainty analysis has been conducted which determines the predictive capability of these models. It was concluded that nonlinear analysis results in a more accurate prediction interval coverage than linear analysis. An assumption made by both linear and nonlinear analysis is that the parameters follow a normal distribution. In a preliminary study, when using Monte Carlo sampling a uniform distribution among a known feasible parameter range, the model exhibits no predictive capability. Due to high parameter sensitivity, few realizations exhibit accuracy to the known data. This results in a high confidence of the calibrated parameters, but poor understanding of the parametric distributions. This study first calibrates these parameters using a global optimization technique, multi-start quasi-newton BFGS method. Second, a Morris method (MOAT) analysis is used to screen parametric sensitivity. It is seen from MOAT that all parameters exhibit nonlinear effects on the simulation. To achieve an approximation of the simulated behavior of SCM parameters without the assumption of a normal distribution, this study employs the use of a Covariance-Adaptive Monte Carlo Markov chain algorithm. It is seen from posterior distributions generated from accepted parameter sets that the parameters do not necessarily follow a normal distribution. Likelihood surfaces confirm the calibration of the models, but shows that responses to parameters are complex. This complex surface is due to a nonlinear model and high correlations between parameters. The posterior parameter distributions are then used to find prediction intervals about an experiment not used to calibrate the model. The predictive capability of Adaptive MCMC is found to be better than that of linear and non-linear analysis, showing a better understanding of parametric uncertainty than previous study.