Some of the material in is restricted to members of the community. By logging in, you may be able to gain additional access to certain collections or items. If you have questions about access or logging in, please use the form on the Contact Page.
Moret, R., & Burgin, S. (2018). Intercultural Struggle And The Targeting Of Noncombatants: The Case Of The Islamic State. Religions. Retrieved from http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_libsubv1_wos_000442482800005
The prohibition against targeting noncombatants is a long-held commitment in both Muslim and Western military ethics. Nevertheless, some militant Muslim groups, and particularly the Islamic State, have created ever-widening space for attacking those traditionally considered immune from targeting in military operations. Our essay uses two theoretical apparatuses developed in social psychology-cultural cognition and moral foundations theory-to explain how certain aspects of post-9/11 tactics on the part of the United States and its allies have contributed to this phenomenon. We also use these same tools to show that similar dynamics work to contribute to the rightwing backlash against Muslims in the United States.
Moret, R., & Burgin, S. (2018). Intercultural Struggle And The Targeting Of Noncombatants: The Case Of The Islamic State. Religions. Retrieved from http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_libsubv1_wos_000442482800005