Some of the material in is restricted to members of the community. By logging in, you may be able to gain additional access to certain collections or items. If you have questions about access or logging in, please use the form on the Contact Page.
Naftzinger, J. G. (2014). Composing Infrastructure: Programmatic Values and Their Effect on Digital Composition. Retrieved from http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-9057
This project investigates the factors that influence the decisions instructors in Florida State's English Department make about using or not using digital projects in their classes, and specifically how influential the English Department's composing infrastructure is on those decisions. The English Department's composing infrastructure includes material factors--such as computers and composing software and spaces like the Digital Studio and Computer Writing Classrooms--and immaterial factors--such as communities of practice and outlets for assistance with digital technologies. To investigate these factors, I performed a case study with eight participants who represent the English Department's three major programs (Literature, Creative Writing, and Rhetoric and Composition) and two major faculty categories (teaching assistant and full time faculty). By collecting the instructors' curricula vitae and some of their course materials (syllabi from 2005 to the current semester, and assignment sheets), I was able to determine what types of digital assignments they gave their students. Afterwards, I conducted two interviews with the instructors to find out more about what factors influenced their decisions about including, or not including, these digital projects in their classes. This study found that, in Florida State's English Department, the most influential factors on these decisions in are the instructors' communities of practice and their personal experiences with digital composing. The communities of practice that the instructors belonged to, both in and outside of the university, can both encourage or discourage the implementation of digital projects based on the community's perceptions of such projects. The instructors' personal experiences with digital composing--including digital compositions done by instructors academically and personally--also play a role in these decisions. Instructors who have a system of support that encourages the use of digital projects, and provide pedagogical models to base their digital assignments on, are more likely to include digital projects in their own classes.
Assignment, Composition, Digital, Infrastructure, Pedagogy, Studio
Date of Defense
June 30, 2014.
Submitted Note
A Thesis submitted to the Department of English in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts.
Bibliography Note
Includes bibliographical references.
Advisory Committee
Kathleen Blake Yancey, Professor Directing Thesis; Michael Neal, Committee Member; Kristie S. Fleckenstein, Committee Member.
Publisher
Florida State University
Identifier
FSU_migr_etd-9057
Use and Reproduction
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). The copyright in theses and dissertations completed at Florida State University is held by the students who author them.
Naftzinger, J. G. (2014). Composing Infrastructure: Programmatic Values and Their Effect on Digital Composition. Retrieved from http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-9057
