Some of the material in is restricted to members of the community. By logging in, you may be able to gain additional access to certain collections or items. If you have questions about access or logging in, please use the form on the Contact Page.
Murray, S. P. (2006). The Effect of Four Virtual Wind Ensemble Formations on Auditors' Perceptions of and Preferences for Overall Wind Ensemble Sound. Retrieved from http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-2170
The primary purpose of the study was to examine the effect of four virtual wind ensemble formations (blocked sections, families, random and center) on listeners' preferences for and perceptions of overall wind ensemble sound. A secondary purpose of the study was to examine participants' responses under two listening conditions: headphones and speakers. Participants were music majors at a large Southeastern university (N = 120). Instrument sections in the university wind ensemble were recorded separately playing their part to a Bach chorale. Four seating formations were produced in a virtual environment by placing the separate audio tracks at one of five pan settings. The tracks were then mixed to produce four recordings that varied with regard to instrument section placement. Participant preferences for the four formations were determined via paired comparisons. Formation excerpts in each pair were presented simultaneously with a switching device that enabled listeners to alternate between synchronized versions of each excerpt. After listening to each pair of excerpts, participants were asked to indicate their preference for excerpt A or B or whether they heard no difference. If they preferred excerpt A or B, they were asked to indicate their degree of preference, and then the musical factor that most contributed to their response (tempo, volume, balance/blend, pitch/intonation, or tone quality). Frequency of preference responses indicated that three formations (random, families and blocked-section) were preferred significantly more than the fourth formation (center). No significant difference was found between the random, families and blocked-section formations. Results revealed that balance/blend was the musical factor that most significantly contributed to participants' preference responses. Results also indicated a significant difference between preference responses for random and blocked-section formations made under the headphone and speaker listening conditions. Implications for practice suggest that specific formations may contribute to better communication among players, and between the conductor and the ensemble, but do not necessarily influence listeners' preferences for overall sound.
Preference, Perception, Seating, Wind Ensemble, Music, Formations, Music
Date of Defense
June 2, 2006.
Submitted Note
A Dissertation Submitted to the College of Music in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Bibliography Note
Includes bibliographical references.
Advisory Committee
Alice-Ann Darrow, Professor Directing Dissertation; Patrick Meighan, Outside Committee Member; Patrick Dunnigan, Committee Member; John Geringer, Committee Member; Clifford Madsen, Committee Member.
Publisher
Florida State University
Identifier
FSU_migr_etd-2170
Use and Reproduction
This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). The copyright in theses and dissertations completed at Florida State University is held by the students who author them.
Murray, S. P. (2006). The Effect of Four Virtual Wind Ensemble Formations on Auditors' Perceptions of and Preferences for Overall Wind Ensemble Sound. Retrieved from http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_etd-2170