You are here

Which is the Best Surgical Incision/Technique for Cesarean Section?

Title: Which is the Best Surgical Incision/Technique for Cesarean Section?.
127 views
815 downloads
Name(s): LeFranc, Noemi, author
Rodríguez, Jose, author
Type of Resource: text
Genre: Text
Issuance: serial
Date Issued: 2010
Physical Form: computer
online resource
Extent: 1 online resource
Language(s): English
Abstract/Description: The Joel-Cohen skin incision is associated with less fever, pain, analgesic use, and blood loss, as well as shorter surgeries and hospital stays when compared with the Pfannenstiel skin incision (SOR: A, based on a systematic review). For uterine incision, the answer is no clear, but blunt dissection is associated with less blood loss when compared with sharp dissection (SOR: A, based on a systematic review and subsequent RCT). Cephalad-caudad blunt dissection appears safer than transverse blunt dissection (SOR: B, based on 1 RCT).
Identifier: FSU_migr_fmr-0030 (IID)
Keywords: cesarean section, Joel-Cohen skin incision, Pfannenstiel, surgical techniques
Note: Originally published in Evidence Based Practice
Citation: LeFranc, N., & Rodríguez, J. E. (2010). Which is the best surgical incision/technique for cesarean section? Evidence Based Practice, 13(8): 10.
Subject(s): Medical sciences
Gynecology
Obstetrics
Surgery
Surgery, Operative
Persistent Link to This Record: http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_fmr-0030
Owner Institution: FSU
Is Part of Series: Family Medicine and Rural Health Faculty Publications.
Is Part Of: Evidence Based Practice.
Issue: 8, 13

Choose the citation style.
LeFranc, N., & Rodríguez, J. (2010). Which is the Best Surgical Incision/Technique for Cesarean Section? Evidence Based Practice. Retrieved from http://purl.flvc.org/fsu/fd/FSU_migr_fmr-0030